1. Start with eligible spending
Use the spending that actually qualifies for rewards. If a category is excluded, capped or rewarded at a different rate, model it separately instead of applying one rate to the full monthly bill.
This is especially important when a user has large spends in categories that a card may treat differently.
- Separate regular, accelerated and excluded categories.
- Keep EMI, wallet, government, rent or other special categories separate when the issuer has special rules.
- Use the issuer’s current definition of an eligible transaction.
2. Apply caps over the correct period
A monthly cap and an annual cap are not interchangeable. Convert all benefits to the same comparison period before ranking cards.
3. Subtract ownership cost
A reward rate can look attractive while the annual fee consumes a large share of the value. Model fee waiver separately because it usually depends on a spending threshold or other condition.
4. Stress-test the result
Change the spending mix, fee-waiver outcome and reward-cap usage. If a card only ranks first under one narrow assumption, the result is less robust than it appears.
Found a rule that needs clarification?
Financial-product mechanics change. Send the current official document or source and CredoNomics can review the research framework.
Report a correction